BOOST: Head and Neck-Integrated Science and Practice (ISP) Session
نویسندگان
چکیده
Purpose/Objective(s): Treatment delay is a significant impediment to effective cancer management and could potentially impact disease progression and survival, especially in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients who are often diagnosed with locally advanced stage disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of patient and tumor characteristics on time-to-treatment (TTT) from diagnosis in HNC patients treated with curative intent radiation therapy (RT).Materials/Methods: From August 2004 to May 2011, 131 non-metastatic and non-recurrent biopsy proven HNC patients completed definitive RT at an urban academic safety net hospital. Patient and tumor factors examined included: race/ethnicity (Black, White, Hispanic, Other), English proficiency (English proficient, EP, Limited English proficient, LEP), marital status (Married, Non-married), insurance coverage (Private/Medicare, Medicaid/Free care), age at diagnosis (years) (median, =50) and AJCC stage (stage I-III versus stage IV). TTT was calculated from date of biopsy to date of first treatment received (surgery, induction chemotherapy/IC, radiotherapy alone/RT or concurrent radiotherapy/CCRT). Analysis of Variance was performed using SAS version 9.1 to determine the drivers of TTT. Data were analyzed using a 0.05 level of significance. Results: The median TTT was 41 days (range 6-249 days). Surgery, IC, RT or CCRT was the first treatment received in 45 (34.4%), 22 (16.8%), 13 (9.9%) and 51 (38.9%) patients, respectively. TTT did not differ by first treatment received (time to surgery 48 days, time to IC 47 days, time to RT 40 days and time to CCRT 51 days), P=0.802. No statistically significant differences in TTT were noted for gender (P=0.637), race/ethnicity (P=0.996), marital status (P=0.737), insurance coverage (P=0.836), age at diagnosis (P=0.571), and AJCC stage (P=0.889). TTT among EP and LEP patients was 46 and 57 days, respectively (P=0.197).Conclusion: Limited English proficient patients had longer TTT compared to EP, although this result failed to reach statistical significance. Other patient and tumor factors were not found to be predictive of TTT. Participants Minoru Nakatsugawa, PhD, Baltimore, MD (Presenter) Employee, Toshiba Corporation; Research support, Toshiba Corporation; Zhi Cheng, MD, MPH, Baltimore, MD (Abstract Co-Author) Research Grant, Toshiba Corporation Scott Robertson, Baltimore, MD (Abstract Co-Author) Nothing to Disclose Kosuke Sakaue, Otawara, Japan (Abstract Co-Author) Employee, Toshiba Corporation Shinya Sugiyama, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan (Abstract Co-Author) Employee, Toshiba Corporation Ana P. Kiess, MD, PhD, Baltimore, MD (Abstract Co-Author) Nothing to Disclose Mysha Allen, RN,BSN, Baltimore, MD (Abstract Co-Author) Nothing to Disclose Sarah Afonso, RN,BSN, Baltimore, MD (Abstract Co-Author) Nothing to Disclose Amanda Choflet, MS,RN, Baltimore, MD (Abstract Co-Author) Nothing to Disclose John Wong, PhD, Baltimore, MD (Abstract Co-Author) Research Grant, Elekta AB; Research Grant, Xstrahl Ltd; Research Grant, Toshiba Corporation; Co-founder, JPLC Associates LLC; Royalty, Elekta AB; Consultant, Xstrahl Ltd Todd R. McNutt, PhD, Baltimore, MD (Abstract Co-Author) Research collaboration, Koninklijke Philips NV; Research collaboration, Toshiba Corporation; Research collaboration, Elekta AB Harry Quon, MD, Baltimore, MD (Abstract Co-Author) Nothing to Disclose
منابع مشابه
IMRT using simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) in head and neck cancer patients
BACKGROUND Preliminary very encouraging clinical results of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in Head Neck Cancer (HNC) are available from several large centers. Tumor control rates seem to be kept at least at the level of conventional three-dimensional radiation therapy; the benefit of normal tissue preservation with IMRT is proven for salivary function. There is still only limited ...
متن کاملProstate IMRT fractionation strategies: two-phase treatment versus simultaneous integrated boost
The availability of inverse planning and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technology opened the possibility of designing new treatment strategies with superior dose distributions, namely tighter treatment margins and therefore better organ sparing. Recently Mohan et al.,1 and Wu et al.,2 have suggested a »simultaneous integrated boost« (SIB) IMRT approach to head and neck Radiol Oncol 20...
متن کاملEvaluation of Acute Toxicity and Early Clinical Outcome in Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Conventional Radiotherapy and Simultaneous Integrated Boost Arc Radiotherapy
Background Chemoradiotherapy plays an important role in management of locally advanced head and neck cancers. This retrospective analysis was done to evaluate and compare acute toxicity profiles and early clinical outcomes in patients treated with conventional and arc techniques. Methods Fifty-five patients of head and neck cancers were evaluated. Thirty patients received conventional radioth...
متن کاملQuality of integrated care for patients with head and neck cancer: Development and measurement of clinical indicators.
BACKGROUND To improve the quality of integrated care, we developed indicators for assessing current practice in a large reference center for head and neck oncology. METHODS We defined a set of indicators based on integrated care literature, national evidence-based guidelines for patients with head and neck cancer, and the opinions of professionals and patients. We tested this set regarding as...
متن کاملSimultaneous integrated boost-intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To review toxicity and outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer treated with simultaneous integrated boost-intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT). STUDY DESIGN Review of experience with the SIB-IMRT technique. METHODS Fifty patients were treated with the SIB-IMRT technique. Two possible schedules of radiation therapy (RT) were used: SIB 70 (70/60/54 in 33 fr...
متن کامل